Move to menu Move to submenu Move to content

Seminars

Education and Attitudes Toward Intimate Partner Violence : The Role of Gendered Educational Composition

Date: Wednesday, May 20, 2026, 12:00 ~ 13:15
Speaker: 주찬호 (석박통합과정 수료)
Location: 16동 338호

◈ 주   제 : Education and Attitudes Toward Intimate Partner Violence : The Role of Gendered Educational Composition

◈ 발표자 :  주찬호 (석박통합과정 수료)

◈ 일   시 : 2026년 5월 20일 수요일 12:00 ~ 13:15
◈ 장   소 : 16동 338호

◈ 주   관 : 경제학부, 경제연구소 한국경제혁신센터, SSK, BK21

 세미나는 경제학부 BK21 관련 세미나 참석으로 인정됩니다.
 경제학부 대학원생  참석 인정을 받기를 원하시는 학생은 세미나 종료  세미나실 내에 위치한 참석 명단을 기재해 주시기 바랍니다.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Abstract

This paper examines how the relationship between individual education and attitudes toward intimate partner violence varies across countries, with particular attention to the role of gender-specific educational composition. Using Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys from 2005 to 2024, supplemented by Demographic and Health Surveys in robustness checks, I construct harmonized measures of domestic violence attitudes for individuals aged 25–49 across 74 countries for women and 43 countries for men. The results show substantial cross-country heterogeneity in the education effect. On average, education is associated with lower acceptance of domestic violence among both women and men, while the moderating role of national educational composition is concentrated in female samples. Among women, the education effect becomes more negative in countries with higher male secondary-or-above attainment, while it becomes weaker in countries with higher female attainment. Oster-style bounds further suggest that, under proportional-selection assumptions, the negative education effects in selected countries are unlikely to be fully explained by unobserved childhood family background. These findings suggest that, in female samples, the observed association between education and IPV-related norms depends not only on individual schooling but also on the gendered distribution of education in society.

Scroll Top